Welcome in store of lynxneed96

"I will sheathe the old sword, comrades, we will end up brothers ..."

The movie "United Safety Zone" which i watched online on 123movies best stirred up a complete wave of emotions in me. I saw in him but not only the tragedy of your Korean people (although into a greater extent), but the tragedy of humanity to be a whole. We all have been types of brothers, people, humans, but this won't prevent us from fighting together for centuries and millennia, renouncing our neighbor, wanting his wife and property: movable and immovable. I asked myself a question that probably worries many - the thing that makes people kill each other? For me, the war, i.e. the rivalry of associations of individuals is actually a natural mechanism of group identification. We understand who we're also, to whom we refer ourselves only when we realize our alienation from another. “Ours - someone else's” is a vital opposition to human life. Evidently this "stranger" is the similar Korean as you. Ideology creates an unbridgeable chasm between brothers.

War will allow for you to feel the reality of life, as Orwell wrote in his time. In addition, it satisfies a person's natural tendency to kill. He could be driven by an irresistible thirst for blood and violence (but for some that thirst needs to be cultivated in oneself). Just provide the enemy, and the rest is not important.

And no matter how hard we attempt to prove that a person is a peaceful and kind creature, there is little come than me, some animal essence still creeps out. Moreover, the instinct of self-preservation in such a case rule isn't followed at all. You are going to say this all unfounded, but one of the most striking confirmation is the Cuban missile crisis, and actually the whole nuclear confrontation like a whole. The realization that you are setting fire to your own personal roof does not in the least keep you from moving to self-destruction. So within the parable "Lord of the Flies" children set fire to the island, which feeds and watered them, in order to smoke and kill their former comrade.

You tell me, just what does the movie "United Security Zone" pertain to it? I think, the film increases the question, can ideology stop being a hurdle to friendship? Certainly it can. Provided the hammer is cocked. Naturally, it may be unsafe to completely trust the "commies" or "puppets of capitalism", because we continue to be enemies to every one other.

In 1953, after no more the war down the 38th parallel, Korea was split into South and North. Subsequently, a 2-kilometer-wide demarcation zone was formed, inside which a special 800-meter lane is made for negotiations. After the autumn in the Berlin Wall, this intra-Korean border remains to be the only such type of political atavism within the world.

Lately, South Korean cinema has become progressively more eager to tackle this topic. So, immediately following the nation's hit Shiri, the United Security Zone emerged. With regards to genre, it is a rather unusual combination of an Asian action movie (with its characteristic crazy editing) and pure art house that could keep you wandering at different times the many time.

The film offers two intertwined stories. One - about how a border guards of the two states became friends: without notifying the chiefs, they begun to meet under cover on the night, enjoying yourselves in table conversations. The second thing is about a investigation by a particular international commission, which should really find out the circumstances with the death of two North Korean soldiers have been shot by way of the southerners. The 3 survivors of the incident won't touch upon what happened, because the truth on simple human friendship might seem too shocking with a with the top.



The film helps guide you great a little something is actually a national idea. Just as the West Germans once imagined of reuniting while using East, at the least those that have them, so South Koreans sleep and pay attention to their brothers through the totalitarian north. The progressive plot in the political sense was prior to it is a pointer: South Koreans, for whom any contact while using northerners have been banned so long, flooded the film, since few of these often see in everyday life how people the North actually live.